21.3.09

Mmmmm, rashers.


As animal rights advocates we cannot fail to appreciate the depth of speciesism that exists in society. Most societies are saturated in speciesist norms and values. We are confronted with this reality all the time. When I first moved to Ireland, for example, I was struck by the fact that there could be three or four dairy-related advertisements in any given ad-break on the national TV station, RTE (there are no Irish-based TV channels that do not feature commercial advertisements). Even though subject to this sort of reinforcement of speciesism on a daily basis, every now and then something – not shocking but, perhaps, disappointing - turns up which really underlines the situation.

In my Ph.D thesis, I cited The Culture Of Narcissism, written by Christopher Lasch in 1980, who explores the concept of an "easygoing oppression." I was remind of this idea the other day as I caught a repeat edition of the Sean Moncrieff show which is transmitted on Newstalk Radio in Ireland. This show often includes a feature called ‘Kidstalk’ in which “reporter Henry McKean visits schools all over the country to find out what goes on in their heads!”

On this occasion, the final contribution was from a young girl of about ten years old who said she was a vegetarian and she thought it was wrong that cows are killed to be eaten and have leather made from their skins or that sheep are killed to be eaten and have their wool taken. After she finished speaking, listeners were transferred back to the Newstalk studio and the first thing Moncrieff said, Homer Simpson style, was, “mmmmm, rashers.”

This example of easygoing oppression within the context of speciesism really jarred with me and I was left pondering just what on earth possessed an adult radio presenter to respond to a youngster explaining her vegetarianism in such an infantile way. It seems hardly credible that he felt that the morality of his own food choices had been highlighted and criticised by a vegetarian school kid to such an extent that he had to try to somehow defend himself. But I suppose it could have been that. Pathetic to say the least but it could also go some way to explain why the very presence of a non-meat eater can create upset and outrage and, of course, the suggestion that no-one in their right mind could even contemplate the giving up of bacon.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Roger

    This is a pure example of the sickeningly domminant lack of compassion present in our civilised? societies, i too am from Ireland and from radio advertisements pronouncing the joy of denny to the flame grilled whopper on our bus stops our country is a violent one - our world is a violent thing and im feeling very overwhelmed by it all. at least there are others out there who notice this type of disgusting amoral living.

    take care
    tim

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment, Tim.

    Roger

    ReplyDelete
  3. Of course I cheered for Mr. Francione during this "debate"... However, with all preconceived information aside, to me it was obvious that J Narveson was totally unprepared and ill equipped to argue any of his points with reason. He was clumsy, rhetorical and emotional. And if this is the best that anti-veganism, anti-animal rights, and anti-abolitionist (in academia) have to offer in rebutal... it all becomes just a matter of time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sadly, Bea, this is not the best... the best comes from within the "vegan" movement itself. The guy who got me to go vegan, I was just talking to him the other day, and he told me that he has no problem with eating animals but is only vegan because of the particular industries. He said that cows in factory farms protest to being killed, but cows on traditional farms have been bred to be killed for so long that "they just know" they are made for that and go peacefully to slaughter. He also said, like Singer, that he believes in neither human nor animal rights and that humans should just respect other beings.

    Pretty sad, coming from a "vegan."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh my... "bred to be killed" and "the just know"? I've never heard this before. Perhaps I'm still too new - to be aware of all the varieties of evasion and flavors of denial that exist?

    With knowing more... I'm less hopeful. But, I'd rather know, than not - so... thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Roger,
    I'm a moral philosophy student at the Ghent University in Belgium, and currently writing a paper on the interaction between speciesism and moral intuitions. Your thesis from 2004 could be a valuable source to me. If it wouldn't be too much of a hassle, would you be willing to send it to me as a document, so I can use it as a source and give proper reference to it? Would be greatly appreciated!

    Warm regards
    Tim
    mail: tim@speciesism.info

    ReplyDelete